RE . . . “DISHONEST Solicitor.” . . . Mr ALF STUPIDTOSER at Lister and Wood
“Tell me . .(A STUPIDTOSER at Lister and Wood) on a scale of one to ten, which is more embarrassing for a Solicitor? To be ignorant of the law, or to deliberately lie on behalf of his clients?” Colin Clifford Cole. 12 January 2004 . . . . . Answer on page 5
Lister & Wood have not managed a reply, which tells me something . . . or an apology . . . which tells me something else.
Lister & Wood 15 Station Rd SE25 5AH . . . fax 020 87713528
(and at 4 Ye Market Sq, Sth Croydon.)
Lister & Wood re; Shop 243 Portland Rd. (Owner S.J Patel 2 Wickam Ave, Shirley.)
Well its now getting on for the middle of January. Three weeks have passed. . . .“Wot no brown envelopes?” . . . No court orders? . . . What happened to . . . . . “we will apply to the Court immediately for an Injunction and an Order for costs” if I didn’t give you an “undertaking by 12 noon on the 24th December 2003.” ???? from your letter of the 22nd December. What’s your definition of “immediately”? As I said in my letter of the, 15th December 2003 . . . “all you can resort to is pathetic threats.” Since you clearly have not proceeded as you claimed “immediately” I think it proves my point. Neither you, nor your client S.J Patel 2 Wickam Ave, Shirley have a leg to stand on, between you.
Well that’s the second entirely threatening letter, with no other content, you have written to me, despite my warning for you not to do so. Four, completely full pages of threats. . . . . all completely useless, and completely false
(How much did you charge your clients for that rubbish?)
SO YOU HAVE ONLY YOURSELF TO BLAME FOR, AND THOROUGHLY DESERVE, THIS REPLY.
You write most facetiously in your letter of the 22nd December, and include “it is difficult to tell whether you are merely reciting old complaints which we have dealt with in previous correspondence or raising new complaints.” Really? Which words do you not understand? Which bits are so difficult? Are the words too long for you? I’ll write this letter with nice big spaces so that you don’t get confused. My six year old boy gets confused like that sometimes, when the paragraphs get too long.
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” your client’s illegal activity in building that structure entirely contrary to the Party Wall Act without consulting me or giving me the required notice (two months), demanded by that Law or even informing the Insurance Company?
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” the question of that insurance, and the fact that the structure is not insured?
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” your client’s tenant, constantly trespassing over my property despite being expressly forbidden to do so? (You hopefully claiming precedent doesn’t make it so. You will need to go to court to establish that. And until you do . . and win . . . it’s TRESS PASSING.)
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” your clients moving their doorway away from our own?
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” the circumstances of your client’s purchase of the property, and whether he had prior knowledge of the damp, or whether he took financial advantage, thereby assuming liability?
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” your client’s and his tenant’s deliberate endangerment of both our, and our neighbours properties, so clearly presented by myself, and prior to them doing so?
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” your client’s and his tenant’s liability for that endangerment, if harm should be done.
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” your client’s and his tenant’s menacing behaviour?
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” your client’s and his tenant’s collusion, clearly evident from the date of their letters. (and why I draw no distinction, as you would wish, between them.)
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” your client’s INVASION of my property by nailing a sign on to it, within my boundaries and the fact they have not removed it, despite being told to, through you?
Where exactly in your letters do you “deal with” our loss of income directly as a result of your client’s actions, and you client’s failure so far to recompense us as provided in the Party Wall Act?
All of which I have presented to you previously but without hint of reply.
Are there some pages missing? . . .Perhaps there are other letters you have sent to the wrong address? Can you confirm there are only four letters?
Where exactly do you “deal with” your client’s deliberate attempts to conceal his address from us? . . and lets be clear, THAT was the real reason he went to a Solicitor in the first place.
Because he had concealed it, I had taken his address to be the false one he used on the planning application, and he did not want me to know otherwise. But he would have had to reveal it to me, if he wrote to me directly. And why he left it off the insurance policy too.
And why did you not correct me on that issue either? You knew it was false.
“ we have dealt with in previous correspondence” is either completely ignorant or A BARE FACED LIE Sir. . . . . . . . . which is it??????
And what does the load of claptrap “We reserve the right to show your letter to the court” mean? . . .am I supposed to be impressed with your knowledge of legal jargon? Do you suppose for one minute that, unlike yourselves, I do not consider every word that I write?
I’D LOVE YOU TO SHOW IT TO A COURT. . . but in it’s entirety, and not the little snippets that you pick out of context. Why do you think I wrote it, in such a long-winded version? Because you can’t show one, without the other.
And you can show them this one as well. . . but of course you won’t.
So lets go over your nasty, deceitful, dishonest, threatening letters shall we?
Ans . . One to hold the quill and 5 to run around saying, “What we going to do? There’s one of him, and only 6 of us. Somebody think of something. Who’s turn to use the brain today.?”
“I know.” says A Stupidtoser . . . . . . . “let’s call the police. . . . Sending cartoons must be a crime somewhere?”. . . . . . .
LIES & Threats
£2,000 + VAT
Solicitors must not act, whether in their professional capacity or otherwise, towards anyone in a way which is fraudulent, deceitful or otherwise contrary to their position as solicitors. Nor must solicitors use their position as solicitors to take unfair advantage either for themselves or another person.
1. A solicitor must not deceive anyone; however, any information disclosed must be consistent with the solicitor’s duty of confidentiality.
6. It is a breach of rule 1 of the Solicitors’ Practice Rules (see p.1) for a solicitor to write offensive letters to third parties. The same principle applies to offensive behaviour. (With regard to offensive letters written to other solicitors see 19.01 note 3, p.359.)
7. Where a solicitor receives a letter from a person who is not a client and to whom no professional duty is owed, and which does not relate to the business of a client or former client, failure to reply does not normally amount to professional misconduct. As a matter of courtesy the solicitor should acknowledge such letters.
Right at the start of my campaign against these obnoxious people. Lister & Wood South Norwood were engaged by the freeholder Patel to ‘sort me out’. He didn’t use his normal Solicitor M B Allen of Shirley. But by a very strange co-incidence in a reply from the Law Society apparently the person who repeatedly threatened me (never identified but given the appropriate nom d' plume by me, of Alf Stupidtoser) “left Lister & Wood taking the files with him.” . . . . And guess where he turned up.? . . . Yup you got it. At M B Allen of Shirley, according the Legal Services Ombudsman that is. ref 29659
I got fed up with Lister & Woods threats and warned them very specifically not to do so any more.
Lister & Wood 15 Station Rd South Norwood
Dear Mr Lister & Wood . (Irony) re; Shop 243 Portland Rd.
If you send me another threatening letter on behalf of your obnoxious client Patel. I will take extracts from all those that I have. With my replies, and publish them in every sort of manner that I choose. With all my corrections in matters of law.
With the fact that despite taking all that money from Patel, you haven’t managed to find one issue or point of order that you can gainsay. That all you can resort to is pathetic threats. And people will be able to decide if you Lister & Wood are a load of TOSSERS? TRUST ME
Take his money by all means, but do not work against me Sir. Or YOU will join a long list of those that tried. . . . . .
Yours Sincerely Colin Cole
Unfortunately they were as bad at taking advice as they are at giving it. And sure enough they threatened me again . . But it was the very last time. In fact they have never issued another word since.
AND HERE IS WHY. . . My letter of 12 January was sent to just about every Solicitor, Bank, Estate Agent, Building Society, The Police and anyone else I could think of . . . Along with lots of cartoons. . . . . . Sue me for Lible? . . I think not.
So what did they do? . . . They called the Police. . . . Complained of harassment. . . . .and sure enough they Police contacted me . . . “Did they tell you why, I was doing it?” says I. . . . “Did they tell you, I told them I would if they kept threatening me?” . . . . I sent the nice Detective some copies of this harassment as they called it . . . . . . and that was the last I heard of that.
I NEVER DID GET AN APOLOGY FROM LISTER & WOOD. WHICH IS WHY THEY ARE INCLUDED ON THESE WEB- SITES NOW.
ON THIS PAGE . . . The 1st of three pages devoted to the malicious lying, threatening, Bunch of Tossers Lister & Wood Solicitors Croydon & Selsdon. . .
. . and this guy is having a go at “LEGAL BULLIES”
FDC Law, Solicitors. Faulkner Daniel & Cruttwell, Midsomer Norton . . . .featuring Catriona “Merciless” Duthie @ St John’s Chambers, Bristol
Have I Got News For Croydon
Council and Democracy.
Croydon Council, Run by Labour Party councilors / councillors / that are perfectly happy to allow Council Officers to break the law, lie or otherwise act corruptly so long as they don’t have to do anything about it.
The conspiracy of Silence
Who else can put a blank page at No 1 on Google search? Coming soon . . Vote Colin Cole & Ken Frost.
Croydon Ratepayers Against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk goes straight in at No 1
Let’s get rid of Labour Party Croydon
. . . Why? . . . . Click here
A WARNING (typically ignored) to The Labour councilors / councillors of London Borough of CROYDON . . . With a little mention of Jerry White-wash the LGO . . Local Government Ombudsman
Help me oust Tony Newman Croydon Council LEADER. Labour have been there too long.
Click here.
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd, to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another. All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total tossers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
Ridaco Developments Northern Ireland (who?) will buy your property UNSEEN . . .
“NO Agent will call to INSPECT” . . We pay 10% over Guide price even if the property
is falling down. Fantastic Generosity. Only through Barnett Ross the no signature
required Auctioneers. Contact A ndrew Mahon NI for details.
It’s THE UNCREDIBLES.
Watch Aunty and Unc-redible ‘ fly’ from Northern Ireland and
and buy a shop with Andrew Mahon . . . a dangerous feat with blindfolds on . . AMAZING
Visit
Barnett Ross the no deposit no identification Auctioneers. We will cross out any
contract and put a TOTALLY FICTITIOUS name in it’s place. NO SIGNATURES? NO PROBLEM.
Telephone bid but no form? Don’t despair we’ll fill it in for you. Can’t set a price?
We will bid NO MAX for you. Can’t think of a name to bid under? We’ll make one up
for you. Never mind our rules. Barnett Ross’s Steven Grossman makes sure YOU get
the property you want. Barnett Ross @ Radisson SAS Portman Hotel is recommended
by Wanker Solicitors IWG ‘s Daniel Ginsbury “lying piece of pigshit” Solicitor
“ I am going to presume that Nigel Matthews @ Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Daniel Ginsbury @ Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? . . . Click here
Granny Robber Nathan Teitelbaum uses Barnett Ross Auctioneers at The Radisson SAS Portman Hotel. Wankers Ingram Winter Green Conveyancing in association with The CROOKS at Metcalfe Copeman Pettefar Peterborough.
SARAH (LIAR) ADLAM here . . . Deserves to be locked up for what she did. Not only
was she NOT ALLOWED to ACT in this matter. EVERYTHING she did was on behalf of herself
and MCP LAW. . . . See the IMPROPRIETY of SARAH ADLAM and her pet barrister Matthew
Hutchings. . . .Unlike Lisa Richardson MCP Law who was probably only doing what she
was told . . . She must have sat down for hours planning skullduggery and PERJURY
with her clients and Matthew Hutchings. . . And she wanted to charge ME £15,000 for
doing it too. I bet she wished she hadn’t now.
This chap is doing the same to Moss & Coleman Solicitors
Hornchurch Essex
he calls them tossers . .
www.mossandcoleman.co.uk
What a STAR . . .
HARRY ROFFEY
In his Seventies and having a go at the HSBC and Kent Police.
His site is
www.corruptpolice.co.uk/
Unlike
some of the scum advertised throughout my sites Harry is a really nice Guy until
you upset him.
Bit like me really.
See what I mean.
Click here
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no forms required to bid Auctioneers.
Contact Andrew
Mahon NI plaintiff 1’s chief fixer for details.
He knows Steven Grossman so doesn’t
have to fill out all those nasty Money Laundering forms.
Or ANY forms come to that.
www.barnett-ross.co.uk
www.barnettross.org.uk
(Andrew Mahon
3 Pettigo Rd, Kesh,
Co
Fermanagh, NI.
02868 632102
0775 665878)
NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers
and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites . . . . Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR
OLD . . . but more likely 2 years old. . . . and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution
in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats
of legal action. . . They will just be ‘trying it on’. . . besides it’s ALL true
otherwise they would have sued me.as per Google search defamation limitation.Pre-action
Protocol for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation
claims; the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm
