CONT
On the 23rd October 2003 you write “The statement contained in the sign is defamatory and actionable.” . . . . . . . NO IT WASN’T.
And I wrote and told you so the next day, 24 October 2003, without reply.
“Embarrassing, I’ll grant you. As it was meant to be, though not nearly as embarrassing, as what would have followed, were it not, for your timely intervention. . . . . . . . . . But not, in the least “defamatory”. If you doubt it, I suggest you get some legal help too.”
Which means that either you were indeed ignorant of the law, as I suggest, or YOU DELIBERATELY LIED TO ME in order to deceive and intimidate me. . . which is it? . . there are only two options. But at the top of your letter you claim to be a firm of Solicitors, so it would be reasonable to suppose it was not the former and must therefore be the latter.
Of course if you write and inform me that you were indeed ignorant of the law, until I advised you of it correctly, then I withdraw the allegation and apologise unreservedly.
On the 4th November 2003 you write “We refer you to Clause 2(7) of the lease which requires you to pay or contribute to our Clients expenses incurred in the management of the property.”
NO IT DOESN’T . . well, not in relation to the issues. This was completely disingenuous and I wrote and told you so on the 11th November 2003, again without reply.
“Your client’s present legal expenses are nothing to do with “the management of the property.” There is no expense incurred whatsoever in “the management of the property.” As you well know. The property was managing fine until your client started interfering with it.
Further, it is disingenuous of you Sir, to try and link the two. And you should know better. . or do I need to give you further ‘advice’ as I did in my last letter?”
Of course disingenuous is a bit of a long word for you to understand so I’ll explain it to you. From my Windows Thesaurus . . . disingenuous = deceitful, villainous, false, malicious, faithless, hypocritical. . . . need I go on?
I do not withdraw this allegation since I made it three months ago. It has been ‘published’, and you have not denied it or ever mentioned it again in any of your subsequent letters.
You are confusing harassment with embarrassment. They do sound a bit the same don’t they? Perhaps that is what is confusing you. They are rather long words aren’t they?
For instance . . “delivered to a number of houses in the street in which our clients live.” Is not “harassment” any more than delivering the Croydon Post is. AND YOU KNOW IT. . . or you would have done something tangible about it, as you keep threatening to do.
Of course if your clients are unhappy with the content, in other words find anything untrue in it. They are perfectly at liberty to sue for libel, aren’t they?
But since the letters and documents were PUBLISHED nearly two months ago I strongly suspect you have not found ANY such “actionable” material.
Despite the fact that, I PUBLISH that your client and his tenant are “obnoxious, odious, offensive, threatening & insulting” at every opportunity.
And . . for instance “a course of conduct which amounts to harassment. We refer to the signs placed in the front window of 243 Portland Road which you (I) removed at our request on 23rd October 2003 (the same day at that time) and also to the earlier letters contained in the correspondence which constituted the earlier stages of harassment.” . (actually it’s 243a . get it right) . . . . REALLY?
Are you sure you are a solicitor? You haven’t got a clue have you?
Since when was putting up signs in my own front window made a criminal offence . . ie “harassment”? The same signs you erroneously referred to earlier as “defamatory and actionable.”
Or, my complaining in writing about very serious issues indeed, that even the same letter of yours concedes are “genuine matters of dispute”. . .A criminal offence? . . . are you sure? You are writing total pathetic crap Sir. Utter nonsense. You need some serious help.
CONT
To further strengthen my assertions, there is this point to consider too.
(I’ll go through it slowly, to give you the chance to catch up.)
On 10th December you claim “Your (my) activities have been reported to the police” . . . (and others). . . but that was over a month ago . . but harassment is a criminal offence which should mean arrest . . (still with me?) . . . but I have not even been contacted by them on that issue. . . which means . . (are you catching up?) . . that either this is another of your LIES . . . or . . (I’ll wait for you) . . . the police did not find in your favour . . or . . . (now comes the tricky bit, so concentrate) . . the police themselves have been sloppy in handling the accusations . . . and if that is the case you should report them . . or . . . if you like, I can recommend someone to you. The Area Inspector, just across the road from you, knows as much about this case as anyone. You will find him most helpful I’m sure. No doubt he’d be most interested to know if his officers were not doing their jobs. But you won’t will you? You know very well, it’s just another of your pathetic attempts to deceive and intimidate me.
Since you are so clearly ignorant of the law.
Let me advise you once again. . . . . . . . As far as I am concerned.
HARASSMENT is persistently trespassing on another’s property when told not to do so.
HARASSMENT is INVASION of another’s property when expressly told not to do so.
HARASSMENT is threats of physical violence.
HARASSMENT is racial abuse.
HARASSMENT is accusation of racial hatred, both in writing and verbally to others.
HARASSMENT is implying threats with firearms.
HARASSMENT is repeated threatening letters (all in all the words “harassment” or “harass” appear 20 times) from a Solicitor, of threats of legal action and costs, entirely without foundation. ALL OF WHICH I ACCUSE YOU, OR YOUR CLIENTS, OR THEIR TENANTS, OF DOING at some time or another.
Partners Christopher Freder Hutchins, David John Wood, Amanda Jane Lister (now Swain), Spencer Paul McGuire & Karen Ann Shury. But which one is Ian Alfred Mike Allen Stupidtoser who told all those lies and threats?
TRUTH
HOW TO
ESCAPE
ESCAPE
I see what you mean Alf.
Some of these words are
really “DIFFICULT.”
What do TRESSPASS
& INVASION mean?
Some of these words are
really “DIFFICULT.”
What do TRESSPASS
& INVASION mean?
It can’t be one of these fine Solicitors
“Solicitors must not act, whether in their professional capacity or other- wise, towards anyone in a way which is fraudulent, deceitful or otherwise contrary to their position as solicitors. for themselves or another person. A solicitor must not deceive anyone”So. . . . I bet the BUTLER done it. . .
“Solicitors must not act, whether in their professional capacity or other-
Difficult
letter.
too
long
for
Alf
letter.
too
long
for
Alf
Regulated by
LISTER & WOOD
CENTER OF
EXCELLENCE
CENTER OF
EXCELLENCE
So . . Which one of you left his brain in a jar? . . .
Which one has ‘difficulty’ with long letters? . . . . .
Which one of you is A Stupidtoser? . . . . Alf . .
. . . . . You are the weakest link. . . . . . . . Goodbye
Which one has ‘difficulty’ with long letters? . . . . .
Which one of you is A Stupidtoser? . . . . Alf . .
. . . . . You are the weakest link. . . . . . . . Goodbye
Alf
Alf
Alf
Durrr!
Question “So when you client’s greedy attempt failed, through his ignorance, you then wrote on his behalf, in exactly the same vein,. . tell me . Was this an attempt by yourselves to aid and abet your client in his greedy aim?
What other possible reason would you have for asking?” . . . “I’m waiting . . . . . . Sorry out of time. . . . . . You can’t have a year to answer.”
What other possible reason would you have for asking?” . . . “I’m waiting . . . . . . Sorry out of time. . . . . . You can’t have a year to answer.”
Partners Christopher Freder Hutchins, David John Wood, Amanda Jane Lister (now SWAIN),
Spencer Paul McGuire & Karen Ann Shury play THE WEAKEST LINK.
At Lister & Wood.Solicitors. South Norwood and South Croydon
Spencer Paul McGuire & Karen Ann Shury play THE WEAKEST LINK.
At Lister & Wood.Solicitors. South Norwood and South Croydon
So . . . Alf Stupidtoser takes the walk of shame . . well not actually . . He hasn’t shown one ounce of shame since I exposed him deliberately lying and trying to intimidate me . . and nor have his partners it seems . . They are as bad as him if they would rather put up with this excruciating pain and embarrassment . . .than reply to my letter of the 12 January 2004 . . . . . a sorry state of affairs . . . . A whole firm of Solicitors. . . . can’t answer a letter between them . . . written by one man . . . with no legal training whatsoever . There’s got to be a reason . . . . and I’m going to get to the bottom of it . . . I always do in the end. I can’t believe the question they can’t answer, is the one at the bottom of the letter .. “Are Lister & Wood a load of Tossers?” . . . That’s too easy. . . . . Colin Cole. . .par84colin@hotmail.com
(actually they did do something. . They told a policeman. “That nasty man is saying all these nasty things about us, tell him to stop” . What they forgot to tell him, was, that I had told them this is exactly what I would do, if they threatened and lied to me again. . . And they had ignored it.”
(actually they did do something. . They told a policeman. “That nasty man is saying all these nasty things about us, tell him to stop” . What they forgot to tell him, was, that I had told them this is exactly what I would do, if they threatened and lied to me again. . . And they had ignored it.”
LISTER & WOOD
LIES & THREATS
MADE . .CHEAP
LIES & THREATS
MADE . .CHEAP
IDEAS
Watch
Rogue
traders
Watch
Rogue
traders
Don’t forget to visit my most excruciating lawyer bashing site at http://www.Iwg-solicitors.co.uk . . . but don’t go if you are squeamish and can’t stand to see a Solicitor’s bodily fluids . . winks
YOU WANT TO TRESPASS ON SOMEONE ELSE’S PROPERTY IN CROYDON? . . DIAL 999 . . AND THE MET POLICE CROYDON WILL SEND A SQUAD CAR AND HELP YOU DO IT . . ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS SAY IT’S YOURS . .
NO PROOF NECESSARY.
( if you are black that is . . don’t bother if you are white)
NO PROOF NECESSARY.
( if you are black that is . . don’t bother if you are white)
ON THIS PAGE . . . The 2nd of three pages devoted to the malicious lying, threatening, Bunch of Tossers Lister & Wood Solicitors Croydon & Selsdon. . .
Law Society Protecting Crooked Solicitors . . . But not from me.. . . Colin Blasts IWG (Ingram Winter Green off the WEB in 2006) Their own site was bottom of page three the last time felt like going that far down the list to look for them. . . In 2008 they are on their way out again . . Say bye bye to the Web IWG
Part of the www.dennissmatthews.co.uk Wanker Solicitor sites in association with
www.dennissmatthews.org . . . www.iwg-
SITES DEVOTED TO EXPOSING CROOKED PRACTICES of these Solicitors.
NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers
and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites . . . . Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR
OLD . . . but more likely 2 years old. . . . and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution
in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats
of legal action. . . They will just be ‘trying it on’. . . besides it’s ALL true
otherwise they would have sued me.as per Google search defamation limitation.Pre-