Mr Cole
Wednesday, 08 June 2005
Catherine Spence
Denniss Matthews Solicitors
145 Anerley Road
London SE 20 8EG
Wednesday, 08 June 2005
Catherine Spence
Denniss Matthews Solicitors
145 Anerley Road
London SE 20 8EG
Dear Sir/Madam re; DISPUTE shop 243 Portland Rd SE25
I have just heard the most disturbing news. As you recommended I contacted Daniel Ginsbury of Ingram Winter Green who act for Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) The people to whom your client S J Patel sold the freehold of the above property.
And what they are telling me in a letter of 2 June is that either you or your client S J Patel has defrauded them by not informing them that there is a dispute at that property. As you know I am actively collecting information about your client’s fraudulent activities up to now, and am still pressing The Metropolitan Police to investigate these matters. As you see I am copying this further information to them. Perhaps this will add weight to encourage their enquiries.
Yours Sincerely Colin Cole
Colin Cole
Thursday, 09 June 2005
Daniel Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House, 21a John Street
London WC1N 2BL
Dear Sir re; Shop DISPUTE at 243 Portland Rd, SE25
My Solicitor has forwarded a copy of a letter addressed to him but referring to the DISPUTE at the above property. First of all let me make clear that any previous letters or copies to you of letters sent so far are written by me. My solicitor acts on the clear understanding that he gets involved when I ask him to. I have instructed him that any further unbidden correspondence from you (or your clients) in the future is to be returned to you unread.
I assure you I am more than capable of dealing with my interests in this matter. (as many Solicitors have found out in the past . . usually to great cost to their clients and to themselves if they have not acted entirely honestly and properly . . . ask Lister and Wood just for one) whether your clients take legal advise or not is up to them . . . . I STRONGLY RECOMMEND IT.
But you say your clients are “concerned to act in a reputable and responsible fashion at all times.” . . . let’s hope that that is true. Since already we have a problem. You write (several times and unequivocally) that your clients “had no knowledge of any dispute between ourselves and the freeholder of the above property.”So let’s deal with that first shall we? I am going to assume that they did not purchase the property without legal advice (and therefore responsible for any legal cost and damages arising themselves) and that they did indeed have legal advice from yourselves since you say you act for them.
If that is not the case please furnish me with details the firm that was responsible and ignore the rest of this letter.)
Your statement that your clients had no knowledge of a dispute means that either you were NEGLIGENT in not making enquiries before contract on that issue. Or you did make enquiries and the vendor fraudulently claimed that there was not. Can you please inform me which is the case?
If it was the former, then you should consider yourselves responsible FOR ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES AND LOSSES THAT YOUR CLIENTS ARE VERY LIKELY TO INCUR in the resolution of this dispute.
I assure you I intend them to be considerable . . not to say EXTRAORDINARY. This dispute is about fraud deception, blight, damage, trespass, racial abuse, threat of fire arms . . . the list is endless. And if you want to know the full story, if you haven’t already, you can go to my website www.croydoncouncil.info. and more particularly to www.metpolicecroydon.co.uk that I also own.
You should also inform your clients that depending on the enquiry that is now taking place into the circumstances of the planning application itself by the Local Government Ombudsman (expected any day now) I will be considering going to Judicial Review to have the Planning Permission annulled. The expense of which I will be laying at the door of the freeholder (now your clients) for the deceptions that were made in the application.
Unless of course the previous freeholder, SJ Patel AND his Solicitor lied to you about the existence of this dispute, in which case your clients can recover any losses they may incur from them both.
The alternative is of course that you are deliberately lying to me on your clients behalf. . . . . NOT A GOOD IDEA IF YOU ARE. The last Solicitors who did . . Lister & Wood are branded on my websites as malicious lying threatening villainous IGNORANT TOSSERS. And if I discover that it is the case you are lying to me . . . you will be joining them there.
The last Company that lied to me about not knowing about a dispute were C**tis H**nes Ltd. A multimillion pound chain of Estate Agents, of ten branches based in Bromley. . . . that is to say they were . . if you look them up you will find that Company no longer exist. They went into voluntary liquidation, but not before they had closed six of their ten branches.
WHY? . . . because they lied to me about knowing about a dispute. I went after them and single handily took them to pieces. LITERALLY. This is a famous case still well remembered in Bromley.
Do not get confused with C**tis H**nes . . that now exists . . the Company that rose from the ashes . . . with my consent . . . but not before finally settling with me first. . . the compensation I received paid for the flat now in dispute . . . talk about irony?
As I say . . I am more than capable of dealing with the matter myself.
Notwithstanding all of the above. And presuming that the previous freeholder S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley Croydon, fraudulently stated there was no dispute. You say that your “client is not unwilling to assist” and I will assume for the moment that is correct.
If you go to my websites you will discover that I am encouraging the Metropolitan Police to look into the fraudulent activities of a certain Mr S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley. . . . most particularly all the lies he told at the outset. Please furnish me with any evidence you have of any deception to you and I will forward them to the Police for their consideration.
I look forward to . . . no in fact advise . . . your early reply in this matter.
Yours Sincerely Colin Cole
Thursday, 09 June 2005
Daniel Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House, 21a John Street
London WC1N 2BL
Dear Sir re; Shop DISPUTE at 243 Portland Rd, SE25
My Solicitor has forwarded a copy of a letter addressed to him but referring to the DISPUTE at the above property. First of all let me make clear that any previous letters or copies to you of letters sent so far are written by me. My solicitor acts on the clear understanding that he gets involved when I ask him to. I have instructed him that any further unbidden correspondence from you (or your clients) in the future is to be returned to you unread.
I assure you I am more than capable of dealing with my interests in this matter. (as many Solicitors have found out in the past . . usually to great cost to their clients and to themselves if they have not acted entirely honestly and properly . . . ask Lister and Wood just for one) whether your clients take legal advise or not is up to them . . . . I STRONGLY RECOMMEND IT.
But you say your clients are “concerned to act in a reputable and responsible fashion at all times.” . . . let’s hope that that is true. Since already we have a problem. You write (several times and unequivocally) that your clients “had no knowledge of any dispute between ourselves and the freeholder of the above property.”So let’s deal with that first shall we? I am going to assume that they did not purchase the property without legal advice (and therefore responsible for any legal cost and damages arising themselves) and that they did indeed have legal advice from yourselves since you say you act for them.
If that is not the case please furnish me with details the firm that was responsible and ignore the rest of this letter.)
Your statement that your clients had no knowledge of a dispute means that either you were NEGLIGENT in not making enquiries before contract on that issue. Or you did make enquiries and the vendor fraudulently claimed that there was not. Can you please inform me which is the case?
If it was the former, then you should consider yourselves responsible FOR ALL CLAIMS, DAMAGES AND LOSSES THAT YOUR CLIENTS ARE VERY LIKELY TO INCUR in the resolution of this dispute.
I assure you I intend them to be considerable . . not to say EXTRAORDINARY. This dispute is about fraud deception, blight, damage, trespass, racial abuse, threat of fire arms . . . the list is endless. And if you want to know the full story, if you haven’t already, you can go to my website www.croydoncouncil.info. and more particularly to www.metpolicecroydon.co.uk that I also own.
You should also inform your clients that depending on the enquiry that is now taking place into the circumstances of the planning application itself by the Local Government Ombudsman (expected any day now) I will be considering going to Judicial Review to have the Planning Permission annulled. The expense of which I will be laying at the door of the freeholder (now your clients) for the deceptions that were made in the application.
Unless of course the previous freeholder, SJ Patel AND his Solicitor lied to you about the existence of this dispute, in which case your clients can recover any losses they may incur from them both.
The alternative is of course that you are deliberately lying to me on your clients behalf. . . . . NOT A GOOD IDEA IF YOU ARE. The last Solicitors who did . . Lister & Wood are branded on my websites as malicious lying threatening villainous IGNORANT TOSSERS. And if I discover that it is the case you are lying to me . . . you will be joining them there.
The last Company that lied to me about not knowing about a dispute were C**tis H**nes Ltd. A multimillion pound chain of Estate Agents, of ten branches based in Bromley. . . . that is to say they were . . if you look them up you will find that Company no longer exist. They went into voluntary liquidation, but not before they had closed six of their ten branches.
WHY? . . . because they lied to me about knowing about a dispute. I went after them and single handily took them to pieces. LITERALLY. This is a famous case still well remembered in Bromley.
Do not get confused with C**tis H**nes . . that now exists . . the Company that rose from the ashes . . . with my consent . . . but not before finally settling with me first. . . the compensation I received paid for the flat now in dispute . . . talk about irony?
As I say . . I am more than capable of dealing with the matter myself.
Notwithstanding all of the above. And presuming that the previous freeholder S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley Croydon, fraudulently stated there was no dispute. You say that your “client is not unwilling to assist” and I will assume for the moment that is correct.
If you go to my websites you will discover that I am encouraging the Metropolitan Police to look into the fraudulent activities of a certain Mr S J Patel of 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley. . . . most particularly all the lies he told at the outset. Please furnish me with any evidence you have of any deception to you and I will forward them to the Police for their consideration.
I look forward to . . . no in fact advise . . . your early reply in this matter.
Yours Sincerely Colin Cole
Amazingly (and you will need to have been following the story elsewhere to realise why so amazing) S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley CR0 8TY, managed to sell the freehold of the shop with all its faults and disputes to a certain Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) .Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN,.
I heard of this on 17th May from Denniss Matthews of 145 Anerley Rd, London SE20 8EG. Solicitors acting for the vendors. So I enquired, of Denniss Matthews. “I do hope your obnoxious client S J Patel or yourselves have instructed the new owners as to the extent of the dispute between ourselves and any owner of the freehold of the said property.” . . . Now . . . I don’t yet know if they did or not. . .YET . . . But I had a bet with my own Solicitor . . . I’ll bet the next letter we get says . . . “We didn’t know anything about it.” . . . And sure enough from Ingram Winter Green, Chancery Lane, on the 2nd June we get “our client Fineland Properties Ltd genuinely had no knowledge of any dispute between yours and the previous freeholder who sold to our client, . . .” . . . and . . . “This situation was clearly not of our client’s making, nor within our client’s knowledge until very recently. “
So apparently this property company , one presumes street wise in matters of property, didn’t bother to ask either the vendor, or the proprietor of the shop if there any outstanding problems of any kind or any disputes. They just bought it anyway. . . . Well who can say at this time? . . . . . One thing I do know they didn’t ask me . . . Strange that . . They didn’t bother to ask the person who owns 2/3rd of the building. They didn’t enquire of Croydon Council if there were any little matters they should know about . . Or if they did Croydon Council didn’t inform them about the little dispute that takes up perhaps 25 pages of webspace here on www.croydoncouncil.info . . . . . . . .below are my replies.
I heard of this on 17th May from Denniss Matthews of 145 Anerley Rd, London SE20 8EG. Solicitors acting for the vendors. So I enquired, of Denniss Matthews. “I do hope your obnoxious client S J Patel or yourselves have instructed the new owners as to the extent of the dispute between ourselves and any owner of the freehold of the said property.” . . . Now . . . I don’t yet know if they did or not. . .YET . . . But I had a bet with my own Solicitor . . . I’ll bet the next letter we get says . . . “We didn’t know anything about it.” . . . And sure enough from Ingram Winter Green, Chancery Lane, on the 2nd June we get “our client Fineland Properties Ltd genuinely had no knowledge of any dispute between yours and the previous freeholder who sold to our client, . . .” . . . and . . . “This situation was clearly not of our client’s making, nor within our client’s knowledge until very recently. “
So apparently this property company , one presumes street wise in matters of property, didn’t bother to ask either the vendor, or the proprietor of the shop if there any outstanding problems of any kind or any disputes. They just bought it anyway. . . . Well who can say at this time? . . . . . One thing I do know they didn’t ask me . . . Strange that . . They didn’t bother to ask the person who owns 2/3rd of the building. They didn’t enquire of Croydon Council if there were any little matters they should know about . . Or if they did Croydon Council didn’t inform them about the little dispute that takes up perhaps 25 pages of webspace here on www.croydoncouncil.info . . . . . . . .below are my replies.
All the Solicitor Jokes on this page are courtesy of hhttp://www.laughnet.net/archive/jokes/lawyer.htm. . .
with apologies to my own Solicitor . but he can take it.
with apologies to my own Solicitor . but he can take it.
What is the difference between a whore and a Solicitor?
. . A whore will stop fukcing you when you're dead.
What do you call 5000 dead Solicitors at the bottom of the ocean? . . . A good start!
How can you tell when a Solicitor is lying? . . . . His lips are moving.
. . A whore will stop fukcing you when you're dead.
What do you call 5000 dead Solicitors at the bottom of the ocean? . . . A good start!
How can you tell when a Solicitor is lying? . . . . His lips are moving.
What do you call a Solicitor with an I. Q. of 50? . . .Your Honour.
What do you call a Solicitor whose gone bad? . . The Right Honourable Gentleman
What is the only disadvantage to using Solicitors instead of rats in laboratory experiments? . . .
It's harder to extrapolate the test results to human beings.
What do you call a Solicitor whose gone bad? . . The Right Honourable Gentleman
What is the only disadvantage to using Solicitors instead of rats in laboratory experiments? . . .
It's harder to extrapolate the test results to human beings.
What do have when a Solicitor is buried up to his neck in shit? . . . Not enough shit.
Do you know how to save a drowning Solicitor? . . . . Take your foot off his head.
How do you stop a Solicitor from drowning? . . . . Shoot him before he hits the water.
What is the definition of a shame (as in "that's a shame")? . . When a busload of Solicitors goes off a cliff.
What is the definition of a "crying shame"? . . . There was an empty seat.
Do you know how to save a drowning Solicitor? . . . . Take your foot off his head.
How do you stop a Solicitor from drowning? . . . . Shoot him before he hits the water.
What is the definition of a shame (as in "that's a shame")? . . When a busload of Solicitors goes off a cliff.
What is the definition of a "crying shame"? . . . There was an empty seat.
If a Solicitor and a Croydon Council Planning Officer were both drowning, and you could only save one of them, would you go to lunch or read the paper?
How many Solicitors does it take to stop a moving bus? . . . . Never enough.
What can a goose do, a duck can't, and a Solicitor should? . . . . Stick his bill up his ass.
What is the difference between God and a Solicitor? . . . God doesn't think he's a Solicitor.
How many Solicitors does it take to stop a moving bus? . . . . Never enough.
What can a goose do, a duck can't, and a Solicitor should? . . . . Stick his bill up his ass.
What is the difference between God and a Solicitor? . . . God doesn't think he's a Solicitor.
Last week I wrote letter to you on the subject of the dispute at 243 Portland Rd which your clients purchased. I asked you a number of very reasonable questions. One of which was. . .
“Did you or did you not make inquiries before contract in the matter of disputes?” If you remember my letter finished with. . . . “I look forward to . . . No in fact advise . . . Your early reply in this matter.” . .To which I still have not had a reply.
If I do not get a reply in the next day or so I will be entitled to assume that you knew very well that there was a dispute and that you Ingram Winter Green Solicitors conspired to defraud me, with your clients Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware) in that matter. Further I shall be saying exactly that on my website, until you deny it, in writing, with evidence.
And if you hadn’t noticed www.croydoncouncil.info has now climbed to page 2 on Google when you do a search on Ingram Winter Green Solicitors.
Are there any words here you do not understand?
Yours sincerely Colin Cole
"You seem to have more than the average share of intelligence for a man of your background," sneered the lawyer at a witness on the stand. . . . ."If I wasn't under oath, I'd return the compliment," replied the witness.
God decided to take the devil to court and settle their differences once and for all.
When Satan heard this, he laughed and said, "And where do you think you're going to find a Solicitor?"
When Satan heard this, he laughed and said, "And where do you think you're going to find a Solicitor?"
An anxious woman goes to her doctor. "Doctor," she asks nervously, "can you get pregnant from anal intercourse?" "Certainly," replies the doctor, "Where do you think Solicitors come from?"
So what does all this mean? . . Here we have two Solicitors . . One A claiming the other B defrauded their Client by inference . . (If you assume that they made inquiries before contract, and it is beyond belief they did not). . . . What does Solicitors B do about that when I inform them? . . . Absolutely nothing. . . Doesn’t bat an eyelid . . . He gets accused of defrauding someone every day of the week obviously.
Now . . it gets better . . . you see all B has to do is say . . “Well of course I informed them about the dispute.” . . . and that would be the end of it. . . . for them . . and B had the opportunity to so when I first inquired on 23rd May and . . . . . when I pointed out what A had said about them 8th June.
It’s not the end of it for Solicitor A of course. But that’s not B’s problem. . . . . . OR IS IT? . . .
Now it is perfectly obvious that B had no intention of saying yes or no . . or even replying to my letters. . . And I presume A also had that in mind . . . after their initial clever clogs letter of 2nd June . . . But what they all had not reckoned on was this . . . IT IS ME THEY ARE DEALING WITH . . . But much worse than that . . .
IT IS ME . . .ARMED WITH A PAGE ONE SITE ON GOOGLE . . . they could not have anticipated that in their wildest dreams. . . . . Nightmares rather. Already they are listed on Google page 2 under Lying Solicitors.
When you bear in mind how much these people spend on web sites to promote themselves you have to consider they are not too happy about that prospect . . . and are putting up with it because they have no choice. So unless I hear from one of them very soon . . . . I am going to presume that Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley conspired with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford Street and their clients S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd (also known as Fine Land Prope Ltd . . . To defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute.
WHAT YOU CAN BE SURE OF . . . IF BOTH OF THEM ARE STILL HERE ON MY SITE IN A FEW WEEKS TIME . . . WITHOUT ANSWERING THIS SIMPLE QUESTION . . . THEN THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. . . .AND I WILL BE REPORTING THE MATTER AS A CRIME . . . CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD.
Now . . it gets better . . . you see all B has to do is say . . “Well of course I informed them about the dispute.” . . . and that would be the end of it. . . . for them . . and B had the opportunity to so when I first inquired on 23rd May and . . . . . when I pointed out what A had said about them 8th June.
It’s not the end of it for Solicitor A of course. But that’s not B’s problem. . . . . . OR IS IT? . . .
Now it is perfectly obvious that B had no intention of saying yes or no . . or even replying to my letters. . . And I presume A also had that in mind . . . after their initial clever clogs letter of 2nd June . . . But what they all had not reckoned on was this . . . IT IS ME THEY ARE DEALING WITH . . . But much worse than that . . .
IT IS ME . . .ARMED WITH A PAGE ONE SITE ON GOOGLE . . . they could not have anticipated that in their wildest dreams. . . . . Nightmares rather. Already they are listed on Google page 2 under Lying Solicitors.
When you bear in mind how much these people spend on web sites to promote themselves you have to consider they are not too happy about that prospect . . . and are putting up with it because they have no choice. So unless I hear from one of them very soon . . . . I am going to presume that Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley conspired with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford Street and their clients S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd (also known as Fine Land Prope Ltd . . . To defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute.
WHAT YOU CAN BE SURE OF . . . IF BOTH OF THEM ARE STILL HERE ON MY SITE IN A FEW WEEKS TIME . . . WITHOUT ANSWERING THIS SIMPLE QUESTION . . . THEN THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. . . .AND I WILL BE REPORTING THE MATTER AS A CRIME . . . CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD.
Don’t forget to visit my most excruciating lawyer bashing site at http://www.ingramwintergreen.org . . . but don’t go if you are squeamish and can’t stand to see a Solicitor’s bodily fluids . . winks
Read what the Law Society say about SPOOF/PARODY SITES such as these and those of Rick Kordowski and his Moss and Coleman sites.
Click here.
Click here.
The Law Society’s Dirty Tricks Page.
In association with Richard “The Chair” Hegarty of Solicitors Hegarty & Co Peterborough. Consulting Matt Jacob of Willoughby & Ptnrs London EC14
Richard Hegarty is Chair of the Solicitors Compliance Board for The Law Society.
In association with Richard “The Chair” Hegarty of Solicitors Hegarty & Co Peterborough. Consulting Matt Jacob of Willoughby & Ptnrs London EC14
Richard Hegarty is Chair of the Solicitors Compliance Board for The Law Society.
. . and this guy is having a go at “LEGAL BULLIES”
Solicitors FDC Law,
Faulkner Daniel & Cruttwell, Midsomer Norton . . . .featuring Catriona “Merciless” Duthie @ St John’s Chambers, Bristol
Solicitors FDC Law,
Faulkner Daniel & Cruttwell, Midsomer Norton . . . .featuring Catriona “Merciless” Duthie @ St John’s Chambers, Bristol
THE LYING SOLICITORS PAGE1 . . . . one of’ems lying . . . . . but which one?
SEE WHAT SIR IAN BLAIR SAYS ABOUT HIS TWAT TEAM IN THE MET POLICE CROYDON? OR WHY THEY ASSIST TRESPASSING FOR BLACKS IN CROYDON? NO PROOF REQUIRED.
“This is not a matter for the Police” . . . Mark Stockford Crime Manager
(Talk about a “conspiracy of silence”)
READ THE RESULT OF THE PROMISED INVESTIGATION THAT MARK STOCKFORD, MADE INTO THE DISGRACEFUL “MATTER” OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF HIS OFFICERS IN CROYDON
CLICK HERE
“This is not a matter for the Police” . . . Mark Stockford Crime Manager
(Talk about a “conspiracy of silence”)
READ THE RESULT OF THE PROMISED INVESTIGATION THAT MARK STOCKFORD, MADE INTO THE DISGRACEFUL “MATTER” OF THE BEHAVIOUR OF HIS OFFICERS IN CROYDON
CLICK HERE
“ I am going to presume that Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? . .
The amazing disappearing Solicitor David Ingram is not only a Ptnr at TOSSER Solicitors IWG, but a Director at
NSC GLOBAL Ltd . .
http://www.nscglobal.com
/aboutnscglobal/more
/management#nonexecdirector
NSC GLOBAL Ltd . .
http://www.nscglobal.com
/aboutnscglobal/more
/management#nonexecdirector
Have I Got News For Croydon
Colin Blasts IWG (Ingram Winter Green off the WEB) Their own site was bottom of page three the last time felt like going that far down the list to look for them.
Ingram Winter Green are PART OF . . SUCCESSION London
Succession London brings together four partners who have considerable experience and expertise in facilitating the exit of business owners. We provide a one-stop shop that will assist the Business Link adviser.
Trinity Financial Limited -(a member of Berkeley Independent Advisers Ltd) specialised financial advice to the owner.
Unity Corporate Advisers @ Unity Trust Bank - advice on all stages of the buyout process.
Tossers Ingram Winter Green - advice on the most appropriate legal structure and tax issues.
Tower Hamlets CDA - project planning of ownership transfer and employee participation and productivity.
We are also linked to the Family Business Planning Unit of the Anglia Polytechnic University, which is part of their Centre for Business Transformation, and this provides a research input into the project.
FSA/PN/128/20051 December 2005
The Financial Services Authority ("FSA") today imposed a public censure on Berkeley Independent Advisers Limited ("BIA") for system and control breaches. These breaches resulted in a failure to monitor adequately a sales strategy which advocated the sale of non-pension products as an alternative means of saving for retirement and a failure to ensure the suitability of sales arising from this strategy.
From http://kays.webdadi
.biz/search.dtx
Lying tosser Solicitors Ingram Winter Green Islington are RECOMMENDED by Marylebone
Estate Agents KAY & Co
Established in Marylebone in 1982, Kay & Co. is one of central London's leading firms of independent estate agents and property consultants.
Legals . . . A solicitor will be required to handle the legal paperwork involved. We recommend that you use a solicitor who knows the area that you are moving to and specialises in conveyancing. You may find these firms able to assist you:-
Tel: 020 7845 8400 (Nick Green or Geraldine Paletz)
.biz/search.dtx
Lying tosser Solicitors Ingram Winter Green Islington are RECOMMENDED by Marylebone
Estate Agents KAY & Co
Established in Marylebone in 1982, Kay & Co. is one of central London's leading firms of independent estate agents and property consultants.
Legals . . . A solicitor will be required to handle the legal paperwork involved. We recommend that you use a solicitor who knows the area that you are moving to and specialises in conveyancing. You may find these firms able to assist you:-
Tel: 020 7845 8400 (Nick Green or Geraldine Paletz)
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total tossers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total tossers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
But before that . . . . . . hot off the press
Mr Cole
Wednesday, 03 May 2006
To the STUPID ONE
Denniss Matthews Solicitors
145 Anerley Road
London SE 20 8EG
Mr Cole
Wednesday, 03 May 2006
To the STUPID ONE
Denniss Matthews Solicitors
145 Anerley Road
London SE 20 8EG
Dear STUPID ONE re; DISPUTE shop 243 Portland Rd SE25
So who was the STUPID ONE who thought it would be a good idea to threaten my Hosting Co?
Oh Dear Oh Dear Oh Dear. What BAD TIMING. . . . FOR YOU
I didn’t know anything about my sites being down until I got a knock at the door last night. It was a reporter from the Daily Mail who was trying to contact me about my campaign in Croydon and to INFORM ME that my sites were down . . . .
The upshot is . . . after a lengthy interview and a long photo shoot we are to be featured in the Daily Mail. (how could you arrange for Richard Pendlebury Daily Mail reporter to contact you at home and inform you about your sites being down? . . . You couldn’t dream it up could you?)
The best bit is my sites will be up and running UNALTERED in a few days and hosted in Brazil where you can do sweet FA about them.
IF YOU GOT ANY THREATS TO MAKE . . MAKE EM TO ME . . . OK?
BEST . . . would be . . for you and your mates at IWG to settle the matter which will be more difficult for you now, since you’ve given away your main bargaining chip . . . the freehold.
Colin Cole . . . . . . .
You got any threats to make Denniss Matthews? Or you tossers at IWG.
TRY ‘EM ON ME.
Colin Clifford Cole
TRY ‘EM ON ME.
Colin Clifford Cole
Solicitors Denniss Matthews get a new LOGO
CONSPIRATORS Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley and Islington have been very busy. They managed to close half my sites for a little while. . . So they are going to be hosted elsewhere from now on (as you can see). Denniss Matthews wouldn’t have a leg to stand on if they took me to Court otherwise they would do so . . . so they threatened my hosting Co . . see Law Society Dirty Tricks page . . . . And of course my Letter to Denniss Matthews
Followers of my sites might have noticed that they have been down more than they have been up these last two weeks .May 2006 . . That is because since they were moved offshore to escape legal dirty tricks the servers have been under constant attack . . . Enough to destroy the hard drives. . . Can’t say who it is of course and it can’t be Ingram Winter Green or Denniss Matthews because they aren’t even clever enough to be Solicitors. . . However I’m told they know a man who is clever enough and he is the MD nsc global CROOK Mohammed Yaseen who used to be MD before he went to prison). Of a Co that David Ingram @ IWG, is also a Dir of. . . . . . BUT is he the same Managing Director now at nscglobal under another but very similar name, Yaseen Khan as I am informed ? . . . . care to confirm or deny that any of you? . . . Not so far they haven’t.
MORE TOSSER SOLICITORS
Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar, MCP Law . King’s Lynn join Colin’s ever growing list of W*nkers who have lied & conspired to protect their clients from LIABILITY and CLAIM . . Click here
Metcalfe Copeman & Pettefar, MCP Law . King’s Lynn join Colin’s ever growing list of W*nkers who have lied & conspired to protect their clients from LIABILITY and CLAIM . . Click here
Ridaco Developments Northern Ireland (who?) will buy your property UNSEEN . . . “NO Agent will call to INSPECT” . . We pay 10% over Guide price even if the property is falling down. Fantastic Generosity. Only through Barnett Ross the no signature required Auctioneers. Contact A ndrew Mahon NI for details.
It’s THE UNCREDIBLES.
Watch Aunty and Unc-
Visit
Barnett Ross the no deposit no identification Auctioneers. We will cross out any
contract and put a TOTALLY FICTITIOUS name in it’s place. NO SIGNATURES? NO PROBLEM.
Telephone bid but no form? Don’t despair we’ll fill it in for you. Can’t set a price?
We will bid NO MAX for you. Can’t think of a name to bid under? We’ll make one up
for you. Never mind our rules. Barnett Ross’s Steven Grossman makes sure YOU get
the property you want. Barnett Ross @ Radisson SAS Portman Hotel is recommended
by Wanker Solicitors IWG ‘s Daniel Ginsbury
“ I am going to presume that Nigel Matthews @ Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Daniel Ginsbury @ Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? . . . Click here
Granny Robber Nathan Teitelbaum uses Barnett Ross Auctioneers at The Radisson SAS Portman Hotel. Wankers Ingram Winter Green Conveyancing in association with The CROOKS at Metcalfe Copeman Pettefar Peterborough.
Granny Robber Nathan Teitelbaum uses Barnett Ross Auctioneers at The Radisson SAS Portman Hotel. Wankers Ingram Winter Green Conveyancing in association with The CROOKS at Metcalfe Copeman Pettefar Peterborough.
SARAH (LIAR) ADLAM here . . . Deserves to be locked up for what she did. Not only was she NOT ALLOWED to ACT in this matter. EVERYTHING she did was on behalf of herself and MCP LAW. . . . See the IMPROPRIETY of SARAH ADLAM and her pet barrister Matthew Hutchings. . . .Unlike Lisa Richardson MCP Law who was probably only doing what she was told . . . She must have sat down for hours planning skullduggery and PERJURY with her clients and Matthew Hutchings. . . And she wanted to charge ME £15,000 for doing it too. I bet she wished she hadn’t now.
MORE CROOKS AT MCP Law Norfolk here . . See the Impropriety of CROOK Sarah Adlam below..
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross Auctioneers. We laugh at money laundering forms.
www.barnett-
Law Society Protecting Crooked Solicitors
Law Society Protecting Crooked Solicitors . . . But not from me.. . . Colin Blasts IWG (Ingram Winter Green off the WEB in 2006) Their own site was bottom of page three the last time felt like going that far down the list to look for them. . . In 2008 they are on their way out again . . Say bye bye to the Web
Part of the www.dennissmatthews.co.uk Wanker Solicitor sites in association with
www.dennissmatthews.org . . . www.iwg-
SITES DEVOTED TO EXPOSING CROOKED PRACTICES of these Solicitors.
NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers
and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites . . . . Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR
OLD . . . but more likely 2 years old. . . . and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution
in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats
of legal action. . . They will just be ‘trying it on’. . . besides it’s ALL true
otherwise they would have sued me.as per Google search defamation limitation.Pre-