Most of the Solicitor Jokes on this page are courtesy of  hhttp://www.laughnet.net/archive/jokes/lawyer.htm. . .
with apologies to my own Solicitor  . . . but he can take it.
Because of all this fuss no doubt The Law Society decided to write to me.
From Emma Wilkinson Team Manager Customer Contact Center.
21 June . . . “Complaint about Lister & Wood Solicitors . . . As this matter has already been reviewed by the Legal Services Ombudsman’s Office, who confirmed our decision on the matter, I can confirm that there is no further action that we will be taking on this matter.”
Complaint about Lister & Wood??? CDT/34859-2004/ELM
Thank you for your letter of 21 June received a few mins ago.
No! No! No! . . . I am not complaining about Lister & Wood at all. Since you would not expose these people I am doing it very successfully on my own. My websites have gone straight in at No 1 on many searches. In some cases my sites are filling Page 1 on Google. See my hilarious new site launched only 2 days ago www.metpolicelondon.co.uk . . but already a Front Page hit.
If you take the trouble to go to http://www.croydoncouncil.info/page18a.html you will see that this is about another LYING firm of Solicitors. . . . Ingram Winter Green . . .or Denniss Matthews  . . . . . not sure which of course . . . . but one of them is LYING to me. . . or probably both . . . . . .  this time deliberately and without qualification, in an effort to defraud. . . . . and if not why are they helpless to do anything about the terrible publicity I am giving them? . . . and trust me . . . it is very serious indeed. I have already put Croydon Council on to page 2 with a search on “croydoncouncil” . . my sites are receiving phenomenal attention.
However since LYING is not a problem for a Solicitor according to your own “review” . . . is there any point in reporting that fact to you?
From that web page . . . . “So unless I hear from one of them very soon . . . .I am going to presume that Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley conspired with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd (also known as Fine Land Prope Ltd . . . To defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. WHAT YOU CAN BE SURE OF . . . IF BOTH OF THEM ARE STILL HERE ON MY SITE IN A FEW WEEKS TIME . . . WITHOUT ANSWERING THIS SIMPLE QUESTION . . . THEN THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENED. . . .AND I WILL BE REPORTING THE MATTER AS A CRIME . . . CONSPIRACY TO DEFRAUD.”

In the meantime I’ll just have fun tearing Lister & Wood to shreds until they figure out what they can do about it. . . . . the fact that they don’t know proves they are indeed “A Bunch of Tossers.” . . . as it says on all my web sites.
Yours sincerely Colin Cole
Ps look out for your name on page 1 soon . . . it doesn’t take long for Google to pick up my letters.
Colin Cole
23rd June 2005
Daniel Ginsbury
Ingram Winter Green Solicitors
Bedford House, 21a John Street
London WC1N 2BL

 Sir   re; Shop DISPUTE at 243 Portland Rd, SE25

          I take it that since you have not managed a reply to my letters of 9th June and 16th June 2005 that you did indeed CONSPIRE to LIE TO ME about your client’s Fineland Properties Ltd (also known as Fine Land Prope Ltd, knowledge of this dispute. I am writing this letter on that very reasonable assumption.  You have had more than enough time to dispel it. . . . you of course have a further opportunity to do so in reply to this letter . . . and will be published in full on my web-sites if replied to. . . my bet is that you will not however. . . . . odds have shortened to 10/1 on.

      I do not deal with liars Mr Daniel Ginsbury so please inform your bosses at Ingram Winter Green that if your company does write to me in future, and given the trouble they are going to be in, I expect that to be more than likely, someone else had better handle the matter. . . . unless that is  . . . . . you prove your honesty to me.
I like the bit on your web-site “We pride ourselves on being creative problem-solvers. Our lawyers are bright, commercially astute and energetic.” . . . . REALLY? . . . . . well you’re lawyers are going to have to be very “creative” indeed to “solve this problem” . . . . . ME.
Until they find a way to sort this out properly . . . your firm will have more “problems” than it can imagine right now.  (I did give a similar warning to C**tis H**nes Ltd, and all their many many lawyers, and to Lister & Wood, and to Croydon Council, and to Met Police Croydon . . but of course they were all too arrogant to take any notice . . . except the lawyers, who very wisely got out of the way . . . VERY QUICKLY INDEED.)

         You are to inform your clients Fineland Properties Ltd (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd) because of that attempt in deception, that all claims I have against the previous freeholder . . . now apply to them.
That ALL the conditions that were imposed by me in the matter of my dispute with the previous owner of the freehold, S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley . . . (I have no quarrel with his wife except by association) . . . now apply to them.
Until such time as they can provide me with proof positive that the deception is not of their making, but is the fault of S J Patel or his Solicitors Denniss Matthews.

From .  my second letter to Lister & Wood  . . 13 December 2003
(because of your client’s threats of physical violence) You are to inform your client S J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley, that he too, is not welcome on MY doorstep, except in accordance with his rights in the lease, and by prior invitation in writing. Further, neither he nor his tenant/s is/are to contact me, my wife, or my tenants, either in person, by phone or letter, or by another on his/her behalf, over any matter WHATSOEVER except through yourselves or any other reputable solicitor. And I promise to attend to the matter with the same speed and urgency that you are attending to my own.
Of course if he does write directly, (and who can stop him doing so, it’s a free country?) I will keep the letter, especially if it is as pathetic as his last, but will ignore it. He can do the same to any of mine if he wishes.

Again it is important to note that I did not ban Patel from MY doorstep, until after I had received the threats that I had to take to the police.

And still further, since, I cannot as an honourable law abiding English Gentleman deal with either of these obnoxious people, Patel or his Tenant in a proper, reasonable and neighbourly fashion. I am giving notice that, if I have any work I need to do on my property, I will treat it as an emergency, and as per the lease, act accordingly.
But you have my word as an English Gentleman that I will not use that right to unnecessarily inconvenience anyone.
HE IS NOT TRY TO RELET THE SHOP OR TRY TO SELL IT WITHOUT MY SAY SO. Unless he declares that since he is in dispute with ME, whether enquiries before contract are made or not, that by definition any prospective tenant or owner will be too. A frightening prospect indeed, . . as you will agree. (how prophetic)

You can tell him also, that I have been threatened, harassed and potentially intimidated by experts, with far more finesse than his own pathetic clumsy efforts. Threatened by lawyers of all kinds, teams of them in fact, with everything you can imagine. . . . all to no avail.”

And later from a letter to Lister & Wood, 11 November 2003
“Because, as I have now established, and it will remain established whilst your client does not take up my challenge to deny it under oath, that S J Patel is a NASTY GREEDY THREATENING OBNOXIOUS BULLY. Who has threatened my person with physical violence. He will not be allowed to inspect my property personally. Or indeed ever step over the threshold at all. He is forbidden to contact me directly in any way.
He may however appoint any bona-fide surveyor, that I approve of, to do so for him, but entirely at his own expense, if it is that important to him. But YOU may take my word for it, that the flat, when fully decorated, will be as sound as any property of its age can expect to be. You may even inspect it yourself if you wish. . drop in anytime for a cup of tea . . .  But he may not.
Quite frankly Sir, I think the request “seems calculated purely to exasperate an already difficult situation.” as you put it.” . . The offer of the tea is of course withdrawn.

            Until your Company Ingram Winter Green Solicitors acts properly and honestly towards me. They can also consider themselves in dispute with ME.
I intend to discredit them with as much vigour as I apply to any of the projects I set out on. And if they have not the wit to be “commercially astute and energetic in creative problem-solving” . . . more fool them.

             Already the omens are not looking good . . . your whole firm of “creative” Lawyers are not able to do something about the fact that my web-sites share the same front page as them . . . . AND I HAVEN’T EVEN STARTED YET. I’ve only been going a couple of weeks. It is my declared intention to replace your web-site at the top of the front page. And if you do not realise that is a possibility . . I have already pushed Croydon Council’s own web-site on to page 2 . . in a search of ‘croydoncouncil’ . . my sites take up seven spaces on page 1. . . . I assure you . . . . I KNOW JUST HOW TO DO IT.

                What will become very quickly clear to the public is, that if your whole Company of “commercially astute, bright and energetic creative problem-solving Lawyers” are not able to deal with a little ol’ retired pensioner acting entirely on his own. They will start to think you are as big a bunch of Tossers as Lister & Wood . . who still haven’t managed a response in a year and half between them. . . . . and that sort of label sticks for a long while on Google, and eventually the wider world.

              Lastly if your Clients are truly innocent in this matter . . . there is a very simple resolution for them . . . tell them to ask for their money back. If they do not do so . . as any other innocent party would . . . that will be the full proof of all of the above. . . already they find themselves in debt to me for my Legal expenses so far. . . £1010.50 . . and rising.

Yours  Sincerely Colin Clifford Cole
Upon seeing an elderly lady to write a letter the Solicitor charged her  £50. She gave him a £50 note, not noticing that it was stuck to another £50 note. On seeing the two bills stuck together, the Solicitor was faced with a dilema  . . . . . . "Do I tell my partner?"
A redundancy in wording: . . . . Criminal Lawyer
Talk is cheap...until lawyers get involved.
"My daddy is a movie actor, and sometimes he plays the good guy, and sometimes he plays the lawyer." - Malcolm Ford, to his preschool classmates on what his father, actor Harrison Ford, does for a living.

Colin Cole 15th July 2005.

Emma Wilkinson
Team Manager
Customer Contact Centre
The Law Society
8 Dormer Court
Leamington Spar

Dear Emma
Complaint about Ingram Winter Green CDT/34859-2004/ELM
Thank you for your letter of 28th  June. You write “If you have a complaint about the conduct of the above solicitors firm, please send to us evidence of that ‘misconduct’ so that we may consider the matter. In order to manage your expectations of our service at this stage I should explain that ‘evidence’ is not merely your opinion of events, but actual documentary evidence of events.”
The ‘evidence’ is a letter of 02 June sent to my own Solicitor. He still has the original but I’m sure Ingram Winter Green could provide you with a good copy of it, if you were inclined to ask them. This letter claims that “our client genuinely had no knowledge of any dispute between yours (myself) and the previous freeholder who sold to our client.”  . . . and . . . . “this situation was clearly not of our client’s making, nor within our client’s knowledge until very recently.”
REALLY? . . .  just for example, this means that their clients Fineland Properties Ltd (also known as Fine Land Prope Ltd bought this property, unaware that the flue at the back . . . which is fundamental to the working of any A3 business . . .  had an outstanding order from Croydon Council to have it removed by court order if necessary.
Quite frankly the above statements from Ingram Winter Green are as likely as one that says that most of the moon is made of cheese. And if you were to ask me to prove that it wasn’t I would have as much difficulty in doing so as your carefully worded request asking me to do likewise in the case of Ingram Winter Green. . . .and you know it.
But of course I can’t categorically prove they maliciously lied and conspired to do so. . . . . . . BUT YOU COULD . . . very easily. But you won’t will you?
All you have to do is ask them to deny it. . . . . I’ll make it simple for you. Here are the questions to ask . . . . “can you assure us that  . . . . either you made enquiries before contract? . . . . and if you did  . . . did you receive a negative reply? . . . or you did not . . . . and if not why not? . . . or  . . . . did you deliberately lie on behalf of your clients?” . . . . what could be simpler?
The Theory of Relativity I suspect.
Yours sincerely Colin Clifford Cole
DEFINITIONS:-
Beyond a reasonable doubt A novel concept in jurisprudence wherein the Solicitors on both sides of the case attempt to establish that the other side is lying more than they are.
Crime An illegal offense or activity which Solicitors are free to perpetrate without consequence, but when committed by anyone else would result in the offender getting thrown in Jail.
Defamation A statement that smears a Solicitor’s reputation, such as stating the lawyer did a sorry arse job on a case when it was really much closer to a half arse job instead.
Good faith To conduct one’s self with honesty and without deception. Antonym - Solicitor
Don’t forget to visit my most excruciating lawyer bashing site at http://www.ingramwintergreen.org  . . . but don’t go if you are squeamish and can’t stand to see a Solicitor’s bodily fluids . . winks
THE LYING SOLICITORS PAGE2 . . . . one of’ems lying . but which one? . . .back to page 1
Read what the Law Society say about SPOOF/PARODY SITES such as these and those of  Rick Kordowski and his Moss and Coleman sites.
Click here.
The Law Society’s Dirty Tricks Page.
In association with Richard Hegarty of Solicitors Hegarty & Co Peterborough. Consulting Matt Jacob of  Willoughby & Ptnrs London EC14
Richard Hegarty is Chair of the Solicitors Compliance Board for The Law Society.
SEE  WHAT SIR IAN BLAIR  SAYS ABOUT HIS TWAT TEAM IN THE MET POLICE CROYDON? OR GUN THREAT IS NOT A CRIME IF YOU ARE BLACK IN CROYDON? “This is not a matter for the Police” . . . Mark Stockford Crime Manager
(Talk about a “conspiracy of silence”)
READ THE RESULT OF THE PROMISED INVESTIGATION THAT MARK STOCKFORD, MADE INTO THE DISGRACEFUL “MATTER” OF THE  BEHAVIOUR OF HIS OFFICERS IN CROYDON
CLICK HERE
On a Search on Metacrawler the engine that searches the rest.  A search of . . .’ met police croydon’ . . Oct 28 gave  Colin’s sites an incredible 13 out of the first 20. You can find their site No 39 on page 2
The amazing disappearing Solicitor David Ingram is not only a Ptnr at  TOSSER Solicitors IWG, but a Director at
NSC GLOBAL Ltd . .
http://www.nscglobal.com
/aboutnscglobal/more
/management#nonexecdirector

My reply is as follows.

22nd June 2005
Emma Wilkinson
Team Manager
Customer Contact Centre
The Law Society
8 Dormer Court
Leamington Spar

Dear Emma
Ingram Winter Green are PART OF  . . SUCCESSION London
Succession London brings together four partners who have considerable experience and expertise in facilitating the exit of business owners. We provide a one-stop shop that will assist the Business Link adviser.
Trinity Financial Limited -(a member of Berkeley Independent Advisers Ltd)  specialised financial advice to the owner.
Unity Corporate Advisers @ Unity Trust Bank - advice on all stages of the buyout process.
Tossers Ingram Winter Green - advice on the most appropriate legal structure and tax issues.
Tower Hamlets CDA - project planning of ownership transfer and employee participation and productivity.
We are also linked to the Family Business Planning Unit of the Anglia Polytechnic University, which is part of their Centre for Business Transformation, and this provides a research input into the project.

FSA/PN/128/2005
1 December 2005
The Financial Services Authority ("FSA") today imposed a public censure on Berkeley Independent Advisers Limited ("BIA") for system and control breaches. These breaches resulted in a failure to monitor adequately a sales strategy which advocated the sale of non-pension products as an alternative means of saving for retirement and a failure to ensure the suitability of sales arising from this strategy.
The breaches, which occurred during the period December 2001 to September 2004, were made more serious by the fact that BIA had received numerous warnings, including four independent expert reports, about the way these products were being sold. BIA failed to act on these warnings and by doing so exposed 3,800 customers to risk of financial loss.
These sites were created because Solicitors Ingram Winter Green and Denniss Matthews  will not respond to my many letters, and because The Law Society will not investigate all this:-
The reason these sites are still here presumably, is because they are ALL not willing to answer the simple question . . “Did you or did you not conspire with your clients, S J Patel, Nathan & Ruth Teitelbaum of Fineland Properties Ltd,  to deliberately LIE, CHEAT and DECEIVE in order to DEFRAUD me of my  considerable claims against them?” . . well not in Court anyway. . . lying is one thing . . perjury another.  All the content of these sites is based on that premise, and NONE of it has ever been denied or even contested.
For the removal of doubt, I have never called Daniel J Ginsbury “a lying, conniving, scheming piece of pig shit, low life life gutter scum”.
I merely ask the question? If all of the above is true would that make him one? Daniel Ginsbury declines to ans either the former or the latter. It is true that I accuse IWG of being a bunch of total tossers for allowing these sites to be here and are not able to fathom a way out of this dilemma. Not worthy to call themselves Solicitors in fact.
I am going to presume that Nigel Matthews  @ Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Daniel Ginsbury @ Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? .  . . Click here
wp4fd7d0e3.jpg
You got any threats to make Denniss Matthews? Or you tossers at IWG.
TRY ‘EM ON ME
.
Colin Clifford Cole
Solicitors Denniss Matthews get a new LOGO
CONSPIRATORS Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley and Islington have been very busy. They managed to close half my sites for a little while. . . So they are going to be hosted  elsewhere from now on (as you can see). Denniss Matthews wouldn’t have a leg to stand on if they took me to Court otherwise they would do so . . . so they threatened  my hosting Co . . see Law Society Dirty Tricks page . . . . And of course my  Letter to Denniss Matthews

Followers of my sites might have noticed that they have been down more than they have been up these last two weeks .May 2006 . . That is because since they were moved offshore to escape legal dirty tricks the servers have been under constant attack . . . Enough to destroy the hard drives. . . Can’t say who it is of course and it can’t be Ingram Winter Green or Denniss Matthews because they aren’t even clever enough to be Solicitors.  . . However  I’m told they know a man who is clever enough and he is the Nsc Global Ltd MD Jailbird Mohammed Yaseen who used to be MD (before he went to prison) at nscglobal (a Co that David Ingram of IWG, is also a Dir) . . . . . .   BUT is he the same Managing Director now at nscglobal under another but very similar name, Yaseen Khan as I am informed ?  . . . . care to confirm or deny that any of you? . . . Not so far they haven’t.
Answers please on the back of a mailbag to par84colin@hotmail.com
MORE DIRTY TRICKS . . This time from IWG Solicitors. Because they can’t do anything about these sites by going to Court . . since that would mean going into a witness box and swearing under oath. They tried to close THIS site down by making complaint to my Hosting Co . . Click here.

Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the BLANK PROXY form to bid Auctioneers.
Contact Andrew Mahon NI plaintiff 1’s chief fixer for details.
He knows Stevie Grossman so doesn’t have to fill out all those nasty Money Laundering forms.
Or ANY forms come to that.

www.barnett-ross.co.uk
www.barnettross.org.uk
(Andrew Mahon  
3 Pettigo Rd, Kesh,
Co Fermanagh, NI.
02868 632102
0775 665878)

wp7ba2dd1d.jpg

Steven Grossman MRICS

sgrossman@barnettross.co.uk
Have a word with Steve about how to avoid filling in all those nasty PROXY forms.
He’ll do them for you.
“NO MAX” bids accepted
.

And he’ll invent a name
for you too.

Law Society Protecting Crooked Solicitors

wp2f87d709.png
Law Society Protecting Crooked Solicitors . . . But not from me.. . . Colin Blasts IWG (Ingram Winter Green off the WEB in 2006) Their own site was bottom of page three the last time felt like going that far down the list to look for them.  . . In 2008 they are on their way out again . . Say bye bye to the Web

Part of the  www.dennissmatthews.co.uk Wanker Solicitor sites in association with
www.dennissmatthews.org . . . www.iwg-solicitors.co.uk . . . www.ingramwintergreen.me.uk . . www.mcp-law.org . . . www.mcp-law.me.uk . . . www.metcalfecopemanpettifar.co.uk . . . www.lawyerbaiting.co.uk

SITES DEVOTED TO EXPOSING CROOKED PRACTICES of these Solicitors.

NOTICE TO ALL search engine, ISP’s, Nominet, Hosting Co’s, domain name providers and the like. ANY adverse legal content on my sites . . . . Is AT LEAST ONE YEAR OLD . . . but more likely 2 years old.  . . . and therefore is EXEMPT from prosecution in ANY form under UK Law by virtue of being OUT of STATUTE. Please ignore any threats of legal action. . . They will just be ‘trying it on’. . . besides it’s ALL true otherwise they would have sued me.as per Google search defamation limitation.Pre-action Protocol for Defamation In particular, time is always ‘of the essence’ in defamation claims; the limitation period is (uniquely) only 1 year www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/protocols/prot_def.htm