wp8a7cd6d5.jpg
From LBC report to Ombudsman (6 months late) Item 6) “the case officer visited the property, engaged the advice of the Specialist Pollution Team where necessary wrote a report and came to a recommendation consistent with due regard to the issues”
18 months and considerable complaint later . . . “recent inspection showed that there was still a nuisance and that the ducting is still extended beyond her property and thus is still unauthorised”
wpa25308f3.png
wp1ced988d.png
wp0cae8464.png
wp16be6d4e.png
wp2d822a49.png
To Tony Richardson Planning Control  . . .IS THAT HOW  IT WENT TONY?
wp99442a7a.jpg
wpf6317f4f.png
“Look into my eyes . . . look into my eyes  . . you both
do not see a flue that is 7 meters short of the roof . .  . . you do not see a flue that is adjacent to a neighbour’s window . . . you do not see a flue that has gas fumes coming out of it . . . . .you do not see a flue that is fire risk . . . . you do not see a flue that is a statutory nuisance . . . .YOU DO NOT SEE A FLUE THAT IS ON A NEIGHBOUR’S PROPERTY . .  When I snap my fingers you will see a flying pig launcher
covered with roses and find £500 in your briefcases .
. . . one two three  . . . SNAP” .
wp7e508076.jpg
wp5f55adc3.png
wpd34d3a80.png
So ANDY. When you went round to see the flue here. Did you think it was one of these answers? Your guide dog can reply if you like.
wp46dc74f1.png
He thought it was a
rubbish chute. They both
sound the same when you
 tap them with a white  stick
wp070f8099.png
wp9c687410.png
CAN I PHONE
A FRIEND?
A STUPIDTOSSER, Planning Engineer  at the corrupt  Banana Republic of Croydonia plays YOU’LL NEVER BE A MILLIONAIRE?
A new chimney for Santa to come down?
A good opportunity for a back-hander?
A flying pig launcher?
A dangerous flue “not in any way that approved”?
NEXT APPLICANT TONY RICHARDSON PLANNING CONTROL . . . . WITH QUESTION 4
ACTUALLY IT’S NOT Q 4 HE’S GOT TO WORRY ABOUT . . . IT’S QUESTION 5 WHICH STATES;-
wp8c02e2c0.png
wpcf697128.png
wp3e4a9854.png
Visit Local Government Ombudsman Watch , or L.G.O Watch the site that tells you the truth about this corrupt biased toothless lot who are supposed to oversee the Local Councils
Click here   http://www.ombudsmanwatch.org/

Read about the dirty tricks of these charlatans at the LGO
http://www.bushywood.com/local_government_ombudsman
_dirty_tricks.htm
wp11433166.png
Tony Richardson did finally reply to my Solicitor . . Albeit because I had told the Director of Financial Services Nathan Elvery that unless he did I would not pay my council tax. He wrote what he thought was a fairly innocuous letter. But there were a few little items missing from it. . . . As he well knew. Especially Question 4. “Can you assure me that the reason you will not act . . isn’t . . .that she has got the goods on you?” . . . Full letter with my reply.

Tuesday, May 03, 2005
Tony Richardson
Planning Control Support Manager.
Croydon Council

Heh! Tony . . . . Re A3 Planning 243 Portland Road. SE25 4XB . . or
GET THAT BLOODY FLUE DOWN OFF MY PROPERTY . . . NOW
Still having a problem replying to those questions Tony? No wonder it took
you a month to reply to my Solicitor’s letters. Don’t feel too contrite though your not the only one. Neither the freeholder or the proprietor have managed a reply at all. . . . Why do you suppose that is Tony? You don’t suppose it has anything to do with question 4 do you? . . . . . Here let me help you again Tony. Let’s make the questions even easier to answer, yes or no answers, same order.
Q2. Given that whoever installed the flue committed a criminal offence (GAS regs2000 amended 2002 to include such flues) probably more if he wasn’t CORGI registered. Are you going to prosecute them as you are required to do by LAW?
Yes (has nothing to do with Q4). . . . . . . . . .
No (because of Q4) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Q3 What time scale do you envisage for the implementation of this notice or are you expecting it to run concurrently with the other remedial work in which case we have got to put up with it for still longer?
Yes, straight away (because it has nothing to do with Q4). . . . . . . . . .
No (because of Q4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Q1 The planning permission SPECIFICALLY states that the shop would not be allowed to trade until an approved flue has been installed. . . .SO WHY ARE THEY TRADING TONY? Are you going to issue a notice to cease it?
Yes (because it has nothing to do with question 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
No (because it has EVERYTHING to do with question 4) . . . . . . . . . . . .
Q4. Can you assure me the reason you will not issue that notice . .isn’t . . that she has got the goods on Croydon Council because they allowed her to break the law in the 1st place?
Yes . . . . . . . . No . . . . . . .
And let’s be clear . . . . by “goods” and “allow” Tony . . . I mean CONSPIRED with her and the freeholder to do so.
IIt took one month for you to reply to my solicitor’s letter. That’s 30 days. (It took me 30 minutes to reply to yours.) Your reply “took longer than it should” as you put it. Was that because of Q4 Tony? Is that why your Corporate Complaints Dept, took 7 months ignoring the matter hoping it would go away instead? Is that why your Chief Executive David Wechsler wouldn’t comment on the matter. . . .hoping it would go away instead? Or why the Director of Planning Phillip Goodwin wouldn’t comment either after he knew I’d found out about it?
Your reply seems very reasonable doesn’t it Tony? As it was designed to do no doubt . . ..”we are currently thinking we should achieve a successful conclusion more quickly by pursuing discussion.” . . .TO THE GULLIBLE THAT IS. . . . . . Well it would have been reasonable 9 MONTHS AGO. If Croydon Council had acted honestly, reasonably and PROPERLY when The Chief Executive David Wechsler was first informed of the matter. It would have seemed reasonable more than A YEAR AGO when Phillip Goodwin was asked to conduct a “thorough review” of the planning permission. . . . . but failed to find that the flue is a nuisance, . . is a fire risk . . .contravenes the GAS regulations . . breaks every guideline that LBC have . . that it “is not in any way that approved” . . that the proprietor is trading despite SPECIFIC clauses to the contrary.
All now firmly established . . but took so long to do so.
AND FAILED TO FIND THAT THE PLANNING DEPT HAD
LIED TO THE PLANNING COMMITTEE ON THE PRE PLANNING REPORT.
I might have been gullible then. I might have even believed that one of your planning officers went round to the property and was somehow mesmerised into signing off the flue as approved.
How did it go Tony? . . . like the Hypnotist in Little Britain?
“Look into my eyes . . . look into my eyes . . . look into my eyes. . . .you do not see a flue that is 7 meters short of the roof . . . .you do not see a flue that is adjacent to a neighbour’s window . . . you do not see a flue that has gas fumes coming out of it contrary to the law . . . . you do not see a flue that is fire risk . . . you do not see a flue that is a statutory nuisance . . . . you do not see a flue that is nothing like the one that was approved. . . YOU DO NOT SEE A FLUE THAT IS ON A NEIGHBOURS PROPERTY . . . . When I snap my fingers you will see a flying pig launcher covered with roses and find £500 in you back pocket . . . . one two three . . . SNAP” . . . .
Is that how it went Tony? . . . . or did he have a white stick?
GET THAT BLOODY FLUE DOWN OFF MY PROPERTY . . . . NOW.
Yours Colin Clifford Cole.
CROYDON MET POLICE TWAT TEAM   . . WATCH 5 OFFICERS in two squad cars  RACE TO SEE A HOLE IN THE GROUND.
Remarkable scenes.
(bottom of this CLICK HERE page)
Thursday, May 19, 2005
Tony Richardson
Planning Control Support Manager.
Croydon Council

Heh! Tony . . . .
Re A3 Planning 243 Portland Road. SE25 4XB . . or
GET THAT BLOODY FLUE DOWN OFF MY PROPERTY . . . NOW
Still having a problem replying to those questions Tony?
Well it’s not going to get any easier. . . because we then move on to QUESTION 5
Which states . . . . . since the proprietor Mrs Dyer insists that your Planners told her to put it there. . . and now you’re going to tell her to take it down, and it cost her £8,800 . . . . . .
Question 5 is . . . “can you reassure me that you are not going to give her recompense out of our Tax Payers money . . bearing in mind that she conspired with you (LBC) and knew it was a fix from the start?” . . . .
Because if you do . . . . . .
Yours Colin Clifford Cole.
See my COMPLAINT against Jerry White LGO
Go to Colin’s LINKS page . .for Bent Solicitors. Corrupt Law Society. Crap Policing. .
Click here
wpa02df7fb.jpg
wpb7252089.png
ON THIS PAGE . . CROYDON COUNCIL’S PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT DEPTS . . .conspire to allow a totally illegal flue to be passed as fit.
WHAT DOES SIR IAN BLAIR  SAYS ABOUT THE DISGRACEFUL BEHAVIOUR OF HIS OFFICERS IN THE CROYDON MET POLICE TWAT TEAM?
CLICK HERE
wp941c2dc4.png
THE TOTALLY UNAUTHORISED SITE  THAT TELLS YOU THE TRUTH ABOUT THE CORRUPT REGIME @  THE LONDON BOROUGH OF CROYDON.   . . . WWW.CROYDONCOUNCIL.INFO
THE Croydon Council information site.
NOT
MET Police London give whole new meaning to . . . “Getting a Brazilian
Have I Got News For Croydon
wpb35ff54b.png
Figures published this week show Croydon Council is the second-worst authority in England and the worst in London . . . . . . . . . . .
CROYDON COUNCIL are stunned into action by “worst Council for collecting taxes.”
No more Mr Nice Guy . . . LBC seize unpaid TAX’s from Pensioner.
amazing scenes click here.
“ Croydon's Labour council is leading the way in delivering a cleaner, greener environment”  . . . when they are not overlooking the activities of  bent Council Officers conspiring to poison people.
Councillor Tony Newman the Labour leader of the council said: "David Cameron acknowledges that Croydon's Labour council is leading the way in delivering a cleaner, greener environment, but Croydon's Tories are committed to cuts that would see the end of many recycling facilities in the borough.
"With Labour, Croydon Council will continue to invest in new recycling facilities for household and garden waste, while ensuring these services are efficient and cost-effective."
However, Croydon Conservatives rubbished Coun Newman's claims. Phil Thomas, shadow spokes-man for environmental services at the council, said: "David Cameron praised Croydon for the work it has done on pro-renewables, not recycling.
"How Tony Newman has the audacity to talk about recycling flabbergasts me. His council's recycling rate is 11.2 per cent, which is nothing to crow about.
"Neighbouring Conservative Bromley is recycling 26 per cent of its rubbish. We could do a much better job and the people of Croydon want to recycle more."
Who else can put a blank page at No 1 on  Google search? Colin Cole & Ken Frost.
Croydon Ratepayers Against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk goes straight in at No 1
Why you should get rid of The Labour Party in Croydon. . . . . Click here
Under construction Colin’s latest site.
http://www.british-gas.org