ON THIS PAGE . CROYDON COUNCIL APOLOGISE . . Rare document found in CROYDONIA . . . Not as rare as one by the Chief Executive David Wechsler . . but it’s a start.
Mr Colin Cole
21 Agaton Rd
Sidcup
London, SE9 3RN
Monday, October 24, 2005
Mr David Wechsler
CEO Croydon Council
CEO Croydon Council
Dear Dave
Please thank Nasreen Panchoo for her letter of the 14 October, and especially for the no doubt sincerity therein. (and will be published)
It is a pity, given that my complaints were to you, (as per requirements of Stage 3 Inquiry) and to Phillip Goodwin that neither of you saw fit to apologise yourselves. But I suspect that would have been too much to ask for. Sincerity being at such a premium at Croydon Council.
Let’s be clear . . . this apology is only made at the bidding of The Ombudsman and at the reminder by myself on the 10th October. Further it is only an apology in regard to the fact that you ignored our plight for 7 months longer than you had to. There is no mention of the circumstances of that plight whatsoever.
Ms Panchoo finishes her letter trusting that my “complaint has been concluded to my satisfaction.”
. . . . well that really depends doesn’t it?
Ms Panchoo finishes her letter trusting that my “complaint has been concluded to my satisfaction.”
. . . . well that really depends doesn’t it?
There are still a number of outstanding issues that have yet to be answered yet alone addressed. I refer you to my letter to Tony Richardson of the 2nd June 2005 and its reminder to Aiden McManus 19th July 2005. (repeated below.) Both of which have been totally ignored once again. (nothing really changes does it?)
Leaving aside the still unanswered Question 4, (the answer being too obvious for words) more important than all of that there is the matter of Question 5 clearly made on http://www.croydoncouncil.info/page2.html which states “since the proprietor Mrs Dyer insists that your Planners told her to put it (the flue) there. . . and now you’re going to tell her to take it down, and it cost her £8,800 (and had to be skipped) . . . . . . Question 5 is . . . “can you reassure me that you are not going to give her recompense out of our Tax Payers money . . bearing in mind that she conspired with you (LBC) and knew it was a fix from the start?”
Mrs Dyer assured us she did not have the money to provide the new flue. . . and let us once again be clear . . . the reason your planners conspired with her to install the crap one in the first place was solely for cost, and the new one presumably is even more expensive. (very expensive if you throw away £8,800 first) . . .
In addition the original providers did a bunk. So the money couldn’t have come from there. So if you didn’t find the money . . . . where did it come from?
In addition the original providers did a bunk. So the money couldn’t have come from there. So if you didn’t find the money . . . . where did it come from?
David . . . can you reassure me that if Croydon Council recompensed the proprietor the £8,800 (as she assured my wife and I, . . . . LBC would need to do) it is going to be shown clearly on the accounts, and will not come out of some sort of backhand contingency slush fund that you keep for such purposes?
As I have previously demonstrated when a large Corporation (and particularly yourselves LBC) deliberately ignore reasonable and fair questions there is usually a nefarious reason for them doing so. And so far London Borough of Croydon’s reluctance STILL to act openly, reasonably and FULLY, entirely fits the bill.
I assure you I will not leave you or LBC alone until ALL these matters are settled to my complete satisfaction.
IF I DO NOT GET PROPER STRAIGHT ANSWERS IT WILL BE REASONABLE TO PRESUME THE WORST, AND PUBLISH THEM AS FACTS UNTIL YOU DO.
Yours Colin
Ps . . its not all bad news though . . . www.croydoncouncil.info is still No2 on MSN search. . . . . and better still . . . I’m getting paid for it now through the advertising.
Cc Local Government Ombudsman re case no 04B05100/BAM/vcj
CC . . . . . http://www.croydoncouncil.info very shortly.
CC . . . . . Met Police Croydon
CC . . . . . Met Police London
CC . . . . . N Panchoo Corporate Complaints
CC . . . . . http://www.croydoncouncil.info very shortly.
CC . . . . . Met Police Croydon
CC . . . . . Met Police London
CC . . . . . N Panchoo Corporate Complaints
Amazing Discovery in Croydon. . . . . very rare apology letter . . . appears genuine . . but is unfortunately not by The Master, Ceo Davido . . . but by a pupil of the same school. . .En Panchoo . . . so is still worth something.
Mr Colin Cole
Tuesday, 19 July 2005
Tuesday, 19 July 2005
Aiden McManus
Divisional Director Development Services
Croydon Council
Divisional Director Development Services
Croydon Council
Dear Aiden re A3 use 243 Portland Road.
Thank you for your letter of 11th July. I am of course pleased that you “have coordinated the Council’s response in relation to rectifying the ductwork at the above address.” . . and that . . “The system installed incorporates measures to eliminate odours using an electrostatic precipitator and odour neutraliser . . . “ . . . However I am even more pleased that the offending ductwork is no longer bolted to my property.
I do not need to go into the circumstances of the offending ductwork’s removal since “previous correspondence” is extremely well documented . . . one might almost say unprecedented.
BUT . . . . there is still a problem. Which I can do little better than repeat my letter to Tony Richardson of Thursday, June 02, 2005 to highlight it. I would be pleased for you to give this your most urgent attention since Mr Richardson has not bothered to reply.
Yours Colin
Thursday, June 02, 2005
Tony Richardson
Planning Control Support Manager.
Croydon Council
Dear Tony Re; Shop 243 Portland Rd. Planning application A3 use 03/01860/P
Tony Richardson
Planning Control Support Manager.
Croydon Council
Dear Tony Re; Shop 243 Portland Rd. Planning application A3 use 03/01860/P
Well it’s so nice to hear from you again after more than a month. It is even more refreshing to hear that Croydon Council have decided to do what they were required to do by law more than a YEAR AND A HALF ago. Ie . . . Serve a Breach of Condition Notice on the operators of the shop below my property. (see . . I told you it wouldn’t be so difficult and they wouldn’t appeal didn’t I?)
Though I strongly suspect that the only reason you have done so now is because of the extraordinary amount of fuss, determination AND EXPENSE I have had to outlay, to get you to do so. A matter I’m sure you will expect I will be making great issue of at my forthcoming Court appearance next Thursday.
Though I strongly suspect that the only reason you have done so now is because of the extraordinary amount of fuss, determination AND EXPENSE I have had to outlay, to get you to do so. A matter I’m sure you will expect I will be making great issue of at my forthcoming Court appearance next Thursday.
You write that a new duct “is to be installed next week.” and that you will be visiting “at the end of next week to check.” So I am sure you will not be surprised that I will be taking a great deal of interest in it too. Despite being asked, please note, that nobody has ever had the foresight or indeed courtesy to provide me with any details of any flue that is approved. So naturally there are a number of reassurances . . given what has gone before that I will need before I am satisfied.
You state now that you have been “insistent that the ducting must not extend on to our property.” . . . . can you reassure me that this means exactly the same as . . . “must be contained within her own property.” as you write in your last letter. . . . . in other words not project above the line of demarcation between the downstairs property and our own. ie the plaster line of the original shop before it was altered. . .Because if it does not mean the same, I will be resisting that, every bit as vigorously as I have so far.
I am sure LBC are aware by now . . . and if they are not, (which would not surprise me given the appalling ignorance your ‘knowledgeable officers” as Phillip Goodwin describes them, have shown so far). That any such ducting that does not reach above the eves of the building proper is a far from ideal solution. Therefore special precautions and conditions need to apply. Usually, for instance they have to be thoroughly cleaned out twice or more a year.
I have written at great length about the risk of fire, pollution and health hazard not to mention carbon monoxide, from such flues that are not scrupulously maintained, and I have received advice on the subject from London Fire Brigade as I am sure you know. Which is that such flues “need to be cleaned regularly according to the manufacturer’s instructions. But the enforcement of this is not a matter for LFB but that of the Local Authority” . . ie yourselves.
I have written at great length about the risk of fire, pollution and health hazard not to mention carbon monoxide, from such flues that are not scrupulously maintained, and I have received advice on the subject from London Fire Brigade as I am sure you know. Which is that such flues “need to be cleaned regularly according to the manufacturer’s instructions. But the enforcement of this is not a matter for LFB but that of the Local Authority” . . ie yourselves.
So naturally my concern is . . .what is the cleaning regime recommended by the manufacturers in this case? . . . is it the same or better than that required by most Council’s in the Country especially your own? . . . and most particularly . . . what system of inspection or documentation does London Borough of Croydon have to enforce the strict standards that these less than ideal flues need? . . I assure you I intend to pursue these question just as vigorously too. Given how long it takes London Borough of Croydon to enforce its directives, (is it really as long as ago as 12th January that you wrote to these people that they had till 18th February to resolve the issue? ½ a year. . . DOESN’T TIME FLY?) . . . . . then this is the very least we could expect from you to ensure that we do not have to go through all this on a regular basis in the future.
As we have established now . . the existing flue was “not in any way that approved.” . . . . so given the extraordinary amount of hardship I have had to go through, to establish that . . . are you going to prosecute the “contractors from Birmingham who have shown so much reluctance to rectify this problem?” . . . if not . . why not? . . . and can you assure me that the reason is not . . . . that you (LBC) were the ones that told them to put it there in the first place?
Can you assure me that these new contractors are CORGI registered and are aware of the laws on GAS flues, in particular those relating to the siting of GAS flues adjacent to neighboring properties?
And when we have got all this sorted out to my satisfaction you should be aware that I intend to go back to my original complaints about the danger from the risk of rot to my floors, and pursue that matter just as vigorously. Not to mention the reimbursement of my expenses solely caused by Croydon Council’s negligence/corruption clearly now demonstrated in this matter. I do hope I do not have to wait another month for your response.
Yours Colin Clifford Cole . . . . . . . . (ALSO SEE QUESTION 4)
Yours Colin Clifford Cole . . . . . . . . (ALSO SEE QUESTION 4)
YOU WANT TO TRESPASS ON SOMEONE ELSE’S PROPERTY IN CROYDON? . . DIAL 999 . . AND THE MET POLICE CROYDON WILL SEND A SQUAD CAR AND HELP YOU DO IT . . ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS SAY IT’S YOURS . .
NO PROOF NECESSARY.
( if you are black that is . . don’t bother if you are white)
NO PROOF NECESSARY.
( if you are black that is . . don’t bother if you are white)
I am going to presume that Denniss Matthews Solicitors Anerley along with Ingram Winter Green Solicitors Bedford House and their clients Suryakant J Patel 2 Wickham Avenue Shirley and Fineland Properties Ltd, 43 Vincent Court (also known as Fine Land Properties Ltd. 2 Hillcrest Av. NW11 or Fineland Properties Ltd C/O Messrs Elliot Woolfe & Ros, Equity Hse, Edgeware ) . . . Reg owners Ruth Teitelbaum, 28 Overlea Road London, E5 9BG and Nathan Teitlebaum, Crest House, 34 Hillcrest Avenue, London NW11 0EN, CONSPIRED to lie, deceive and defraud me of my considerable claims in the matter of this dispute. . . See why ? . .
Click here
Click here
HOLD IT EVERYONE LETS SEE WHAT’S ON THE NEXT PAGE
Don’t miss the surprise after the
FIREWORKS DISPLAY BOTTOM OF PAGE
FIREWORKS DISPLAY BOTTOM OF PAGE
Have I Got News For Croydon
Who else can put a blank page at No 1 Google search?
Colin Cole & Ken Frost.
Croydon Ratepayers Against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk goes straight in at No 1
Click here
Colin Cole & Ken Frost.
Croydon Ratepayers Against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk goes straight in at No 1
Click here
Who else can put a blank page at No 1 on Google search? Coming soon . . Vote Colin Cole & Ken Frost.
Croydon Ratepayers Against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk goes straight in at No 1
Let’s get rid of Labour Party Croydon
. . . Why? . . . . Click here
Croydon Ratepayers Against Croydon Council
http://www.cracc.co.uk goes straight in at No 1
Let’s get rid of Labour Party Croydon
. . . Why? . . . . Click here
A WARNING (typically ignored) to The Labour councilors / councillors of London Borough of CROYDON . . . With a little mention of Jerry White-wash the LGO . . Local Government Ombudsman
Help me oust Tony Newman Croydon Council LEADER. Labour have been there too long.
Click here.
Click here.
What a STAR . . .
HARRY ROFFEY
In his Seventies and having a go at the HSBC and Kent Police.
His site is
www.corruptpolice.co.uk/
Unlike
some of the scum advertised throughout my sites Harry is a really nice Guy until
you upset him.
Bit like me really.
See what I mean.
Click here
Colin’s NEW sites
Barnett Ross the no forms required to bid Auctioneers.
Contact Andrew
Mahon NI plaintiff 1’s chief fixer for details.
He knows Steven Grossman so doesn’t
have to fill out all those nasty Money Laundering forms.
Or ANY forms come to that.
www.barnett-
(Andrew Mahon
3 Pettigo Rd, Kesh,
Co
Fermanagh, NI.
02868 632102
0775 665878)
Steven Grossman MRICS
sgrossman@barnettross.co.uk
Have a word with Steve about how to avoid filling in all
those nasty PROXY forms.
He’ll do them for you.
“NO MAX” bids accepted.
And he’ll
invent a name
for you too.
Council and Democracy.
Croydon Council, Run by Labour Party councilors / councillors / that are perfectly happy to allow Council Officers to break the law, lie or otherwise act corruptly so long as they don’t have to do anything about it.
The conspiracy of Silence
Croydon Council, Run by Labour Party councilors / councillors / that are perfectly happy to allow Council Officers to break the law, lie or otherwise act corruptly so long as they don’t have to do anything about it.
The conspiracy of Silence